Willingness to Pay for Relief Transcript
Raw commuter responses on current substitute spending and relative priorities
Following the toolkit naming conventions, this file is named
exp-10.d-wtp-detail-2025-03-20.qmd
.
Overview
This file contains the raw responses from a small intercept survey of late-evening subway commuters in Queens.
It supports the demo: Pain Validation with Maya Patel.
- Date: March 20, 2025
- Location: Queens subway stations, after 9:00pm
- Sample size: 10 respondents (n=10)
- Format: Short intercept questions (5–7 minutes each)
Protocol
Questions asked (from the Pain Testing Guide):
- What do you currently spend to reduce or avoid this pain? (fees, rideshare, apps, buffers)
- What unpaid costs do you incur? (extra time, stress, favors, inconvenience)
- If you had to choose, which pain would you be most willing to pay to remove first?
Respondent Summaries
R1 — 26, grad student
- Substitute spending: $40/month on rideshares (2–3 late trips).
- Unpaid costs: Extra 40 minutes/week walking longer routes.
- Relative WTP: Dark/unlit blocks ranked first.
- Quote: “I’d happily keep paying for rideshare if it meant not worrying.”
R2 — 46, office manager
- Substitute spending: None in money.
- Unpaid costs: 15 min buffer time most nights.
- Relative WTP: Detours ranked first (makes her late for family).
- Quote: “The money doesn’t matter as much as the lost time with my kids.”
R3 — 29, office assistant
- Substitute spending: $25/month on transit apps and occasional rideshare.
- Unpaid costs: Text check-ins, stress.
- Relative WTP: Dark/unlit blocks ranked first.
- Quote: “I already pay for peace of mind — but I’d pay more if something really worked.”
R4 — 41, delivery driver
- Substitute spending: None.
- Unpaid costs: Mild stress only.
- Relative WTP: Crowded exits ranked first.
- Quote: “Not worth money — I just deal with it.”
(Continue through R5–R10 with similar format.)
Data Table (Compiled)
Respondent | Segment | $/mo Spent | Unpaid Costs | Top WTP Pain | Quote (short) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | Grad student | $40 | 40 min/wk walking | Dark/unlit blocks | “I’d happily keep paying for rideshare.” |
R2 | Restaurant worker | $0 | 15 min buffer | Detours | “Lost time with kids matters most.” |
R3 | Office assistant | $25 | Stress, check-ins | Dark/unlit blocks | “I already pay for peace of mind.” |
R4 | Delivery driver | $0 | Mild stress | Crowded exits | “Not worth money — I just deal.” |
… | … | … | … | … | … |
Notes & Reflections
- Substitute spending: 4 of 10 respondents already pay for substitutes (rideshare, apps).
- Unpaid costs: Almost all incur hidden costs — time buffers, stress, reliance on others.
- Relative WTP: Dark/unlit blocks most frequently chosen as the pain worth paying to remove first.
- Variation: Some commuters resist the framing of WTP (e.g., “I just deal with it”), reinforcing the need to look at actual behavior rather than hypotheticals.
Traceability
- From clusters: Commuting themes
- From persona: Maya Patel
- From experience map: Maya Patel commute
- From pain hypothesis: Maya Patel commuting pain hypothesis
- Next step: Summarize these results for the pain hypothesis test summary
- Toolkit link: Pain Testing Guide